Creaming off a profit. GRM Daily/YouTube.

Some ex-detectives get an allotment. Liam investigates barbershops. He isn’t a policeman anymore, but old habits apparently die hard. For eight years, he worked undercover, posing as a junkie to score 20 quid deals of crack and heroin. The baggies are gone now, but Liam is still as inquisitive as ever. “Did you see the Turkish barbershop as you drove in?” he asks, shaking his head. “They must charge 500 quid for a short back and sides. I did a Companies House check: they turned over half a million last year.”
The place he’s talking about isn’t Turkish — nor is it much of a hairdresser. But it is almost certainly laundering drug money. Most UK high streets have similar barbershops, or nail bars, or mysteriously diner-free restaurants. Speaking under a pseudonym, Liam meets me not on a gritty housing estate, but in rural Hampshire, in a village with a green and a coaching inn. It’s hard to think of a better example of modern British drug dealing, of county lines stretching right across the nation.
The phenomenon has usually been depicted as an invasion of urban street gangs, trafficking narcotics to far-flung provinces. These days, though, the model has evolved, “growing arms and legs” as we used to say on the force. Dealers once ran drugs from their city redoubts. Now they’ve moved the business model into local communities. With the dealers, of course, comes misery: eye-watering violence, yes, but also innocents pressured by gangs into ruining their lives. It demonstrates how buyers are complicit in the suffering of others — and how even law-abiding Brits now struggle to escape the chaos, as disorder creeps from London estates to the leafy Home Counties.
The most obvious way of understanding Britain’s drug problem is by the numbers. Official statistics put the annual value of the country’s narcotics market at £10 billion, even as drug-related crime costs about the same again. This is before you consider the wider culture of drugs. Our national appetite for narcotics is insatiable. Gak. White. Chop. Chisel. Luca. Drugs permeate our society, like needles in an addict’s arm. A new Danny Dyer movie is called Marching Powder, for fuck’s sake. Apparently it’s a romantic comedy.
Then there are the gangs themselves, bewildering in their variety. Somali gangs from southeast London traditionally ran drugs down to Kent, from Mogadishu to Margate if you will. All the while, Albanian and Turkish gangs from north and east London work Hertfordshire and Essex; west Londoners, mainly Afro-Caribbean, take Hampshire, Berkshire and Surrey. As those Home Counties names imply, this is a business that long ago transcended its urban roots. One year, a detective told me, the biggest post-Carnival party happened in that famous west London neighbourhood — Basingstoke.
Given this ubiquity, across the southeast and beyond, it’s perhaps unsurprising that Britain’s drug trade happens more or less openly, clear enough when I swing by that barbershop in Hampshire. It’s a sepia-coloured, dusty sort of place. Quiet. The sign looks amateurish. A young woman appears in the doorway, smoking a cigarette and checking her phone. She looks up and down the street, then disappears back inside.
The obviousness of the façade is almost comical, even as these places are the terminus of the whole business. Cash-only, high turnover businesses like barbershops are ideal places for laundering money. Some of the proceeds of drug-dealing enters the cash register dirty, coming out the other end as clean as a head of freshly washed hair. They are quickly set up and closed as necessary. And, in quiet rural communities, they can hide in plain sight.
At the other end of the funnel are mostly North African and Albanian mafias, importing drugs through corruption-addled ports like Rotterdam and Le Havre. Drugs are smuggled in lorries, cars and even body-packed. They come in on cargo ships, yachts and barges. The ingenuity of the smugglers is driven by profit and demand. These networks are violent and determined, prepared to murder judges, journalists and politicians. Parts of the Low Countries increasingly resemble soggier analogues of Juarez.
Then there’s the middle-market, the retailers, who brazenly use social media to plug their wares. They offer cheap drugs as tasters, to get users hooked. They also offer ubiquity and ease of supply. Cocaine dealers will always promise the best stuff, even though it’s often heavily cut.
For low-level dealers and for many users, this is basically victimless crime. The punters crave and the market provides. They’re wrong. Liam mentions an operation where a teenage runner kept hassling him to score cannabis. Liam wasn’t interested — he was after Class A drugs — but made the buy to get the kid off his back. When the police raided the teen’s house, they found a Kalashnikov in his bedroom. “People fail to appreciate how young they are,” one officer tells me. “These kids literally have nothing. They join gangs for a new pair of trainers.” The lines have swallowed an entire generation of underclass children, lost boys and girls disappearing into an underbelly of near-Victorian squalor.
If you know where to look, there’s even worse here too. Another detective once told me about a North London drugs line operating in semi-rural Scotland. A local dealer “skanked” the gang out of £200. To set an example, London gang members forced him to have sex with a dog. At gunpoint. This isn’t an Irvine Welsh novel. This is real life.
All the while, dealers and runners bully vulnerable people into surrendering their homes to use as bases of operations — a practice known as “cuckooing”. This remains a hidden crime, far from the stereotypical Top Boy world of street gangs, zombie knives and drill music. It is, however, as crucial to the whole business model as those deserted rural barbers. Among other things, cuckooing offers cheap, discreet accommodation. It also provides a steady source of slave labour.
To understand how cuckooing works, I visit Catalyst Support. A charity supporting victims, it’s based in Woking, a commuter town off the M25. Hardly the hood — but Surrey is county lines turf now. Nick, a veteran caseworker, has the air of a man who’s seen and heard it all.
“We had one client coerced into moving county line gang members into his elderly parent’s house,” he tells me. “They ended up using the place to store and deal drugs.” Age seems to be no barrier to falling victim to cuckooing. In fact, middle-aged and older people, especially those with learning difficulties, are especially vulnerable.
Catalyst Support can offer assistance, but one theme is grimly familiar. As Nick says of another cuckooing case, which took place in a small English village, “it was obvious. A vulnerable person, living alone, suddenly has loads of new visitors? Yet none of the neighbours said a thing.” I can’t help but think of Liam’s barbershop, and how drugs are a “crime accelerator” prompting other types of offending. I’m thinking here of a spate of cashpoint thefts plaguing quiet service stations, gangs using gas tanks to blast ATMs from garage walls.
There are victories. The charity assisted the Home Office and other public bodies to formulate legislation that will make cuckooing a specific criminal offence. That’s progress, especially when victims are sometimes offenders too. Making it a specific crime, the charity suggests, helps clarify the status of cuckooing victims. Still, issues remain. Cuts often hit preventative services like Catalyst Support. Then there’s the perennial bane of third-sector organisations: performance indicators used to justify funding. Whitehall targets are often aimed at eye-catching problems like knife crime, rather than the hard yards of crimes like cuckooing.
The police have responded too: mapping gangs, markets and trafficking routes. In law enforcement vernacular, this is “Level Two” cross-border crime under the National Intelligence Model. Chief officers love theoretical models. They offer an illusion of control, despite highlighting the essentially parochial nature of UK forces. Criminals, it goes without saying, don’t recognise borders. But the cops? The border between Orpington and Swanley — marking where the Met gives way to Kent Police — once resembled the 38th Parallel.
This was a weakness gangs took advantage of, until police changed tactics. They formed cross-border task forces, to proactively target offenders. Even so, austerity-decimated local constabularies often found operations too time-consuming and resource-intensive. By the time they caught up, the lines were dug in. To be fair, officers tell me, support from the centre has improved significantly. That’s especially true around identifying offenders from communications data.
Yet all the while, organised criminal groups have multiplied. This is partly due immigration patterns. For example, gangs from Sub-Saharan Africa are slowly replacing the Somalis who dominated southeast London a decade ago. Then there are settled ethnic gangs from Eastern Europe, who’ve been in the UK for decades. Criminals also rely on refugees from war-torn nations: young men used to chaotic lifestyles involving violence. And, crucially, these gangs quickly cross-pollinate with local, white criminal groups in provinces outside the big cities. The county lines are a truly multinational, multicultural enterprise.
These new criminals are offering new products too. After the Taliban stymied heroin production in Afghanistan, the street price in Britain rocketed, leading to an increase in highly dangerous synthetic opioids from China. According to investigators, drugs like Nitazenes are the next big thing. Cheap to produce, and offering a fuzzy, heroin-like high, they offer a huge return on investment. If misused, they can also be very dangerous — Nitazenes can be 800 times as potent as the equivalent dose of morphine.
What hasn’t changed is the young age of offenders, both dealers and runners alike. Once ensnared, and subject to violence and sexual abuse, some became dealers themselves. “The question I’d ask,” one officer wonders, “is how did we get to this point? There’s a massive failure of parenting and education in the UK.”
I’m soon tempted to ask myself the same question. In another semi-rural town, this time in Surrey, I see another barbershop. Two kids in hoodies loiter outside a newsagents, like meerkats, their eyes scanning the streets for trouble. An Audi SUV is parked nearby, cannabis smoke bleeding from the semi-open, blacked-out windows. I’m not even looking for this stuff, but here it is. I wonder what the kids are thinking. In their minds, is this pretty village their corner? Their ends?
It’s impossible not to see this as a symptom of full-spectrum societal failure — and those kids are just the start. I’m reminded of the familiar argument: if you saw how meat pies were made, you’d never eat one. Perhaps well-heeled Surrey commuters, ordering their weekend baggies of poorly-cut cocaine, should set foot in a traphouse or watch a teenage runner bleed out on the pavement. In the lines business, that’s exactly how the pie is made. Yet this weekend alone, nearly 50 kilos of dirty powder are destined to hit London’s collective septum. For some reason, our opinion-forming and media classes rarely protest about that particular drug. Then again, they’ve probably never been cuckooed.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeYep. To quote Rick James, Cocaine’s a helluva drug….
” … a vulnerable person, living alone, suddenly has loads of new visitors? Yet none of the neighbours said a thing.”
Who exactly are they going to say a thing to? The police? At best nothing happens. At worst the police are being paid off and they tell the criminals who snitched.
Someone please explain how our police are so ready to arrest people for online harms and yet unwilling or unable to deal with these money laundering operations?!
I work in a market town in the home counties and we have one of these barbershops. Never seem very busy but their barbers drive very sparkly Ranger Rover Sports and big AMG Mercs.
Something doesn’t add up.
You should pop in for a trim. Suss the place out….
It adds up alright, just not in the way you mean.
Look at the question through the opposite side of the lens – Q: this is why the drug problem is utterly out of control? A: because the police find it much easier and less stressful to sit at computer screens spying on our social media posts for hate crimes and Non Crime Hate Incidents (‘thank you’ to the Tory government that introduced this nightmare). Who would you rather arrest: a youth with an AK47 in his bedroom, or a harmless old granny? Game over!
It’s the ultimate indictment of our useless police, isn’t it? Everyone knows what these people are doing. Nothing happens.
For some reason, our opinion-forming and media classes rarely protest about that particular drug.
Surely the reason is not too difficult to surmise.
Very true. They can afford cocaine which is a sign of success. Crack on the other hand is a national scourge and the poor must be punished for becoming addicted.
Hit the infrastructure.
In my view the key management tool is the mobile phone, manage this effectively.
When I travel (well, before the eSIM availability) I would buy a local SIM. Whether in the Caribbean or Africa I had to provide a Passport to verify my identity. If we implemented this rigorously in the UK there would be manifold “wins”. No easy burner phones, trace mobile numbers to a verified person etc etc.
Could have a child SIM to limit access to inappropriate content as well.
OK; there would be ways around this, the eSIM would be one and foreign SIM cards but much more problematic to use. Problems with fraud as well, but not insurmountable and put a dent in the easy communication routes for these parasites.
Criminals who traffic people into the country would have little difficulty trafficking phones. The criminals switch burners weekly. Phones would also be put in the name of the people already being exploited as cuckoos, prisoners, tourists etc. .
Thank goodness for those hate laws instituted by Blair and allowed to thrive under the Tories that our police so love to enforce so vehemently. This country would be such a worrying place to live without them.
Why is cannabis sold in ounces, but cocaine in grams?.
There cannot be a “free” market in general, but not in drugs, or prostitution, or pornography, or unrestricted alcohol, or unrestricted gambling. That is an important part of why there must not be a “free” market in general, which is a political choice, not a law of nature.
Enacting and enforcing laws against drugs, prostitution and pornography, and regulating alcohol, tobacco and gambling, are clear examples of State intervention in, and regulation of, the economy. Radical change would be impossible if the workers, the youth and the poor were in a state of stupefaction, and that baleful situation, which has been contrived in the past, is being contrived again today.
Unlike the Conservative Party, which merely thinks that it is and acts as if it were, the Labour Party and the Liberal Democrats are constitutionally committed to the “free” market. Richard Tice wants to legalise cannabis, Nigel Farage wants to legalise drugs across the board, and Lee Anderson signed a select committee report in that direction in 2023.
Instead, we need a single category of illegal drug, including cannabis, with a crackdown on possession, including a mandatory sentence of two years for a first offence, three years for a second offence, four years for a third offence, and so on. We need to restore the specific criminal offence of allowing one’s premises to be used for illegal drug purposes. And Peter Hitchens’s The War We Never Fought should be taught in schools, as pro-drugs propaganda is routinely.
A better idea would be for the state to put back onto the market the drugs they’ve seized, but cut with a brutal and long-lasting purgative. Even if it didn’t halt the trade the consequences at places like the BBC would be quite entertaining.
I think you might find that the police already put a portion of drugs they have seized back in the market. Do purgatives even work when they insufflated?
…so maybe it’s time to legalise it all then?
Police never seem to be able to reach this blindingly obvious conclusion, despite it being abundantly clear to every honest observer that the war on drugs has failed, and can only fail. Drug gangs rely on drugs being illegal. Therefore…
Yes. Either get serious about enforcement (an impossibility as far as I can see) or legalise. Let Glaxo take care of quality control and Boots take care of sales. That’s £10bn from drug-related crime saved and a whole lot of VAT and/or other duties made.
Well said sir. Legalisation is the only answer, and let ‘Darwinian’ self-selection take care of the rest.
If freedom means anything, it means the right to finish yourself off by Bacchanalian excess.
No doubt the tax levied on that extra £10 billion could be squandered on something completely pointless such as ‘gender awareness’, or ‘diversity training’.
The benefits system and the NHS would have to pick up the pieces – the £10bn would soon be gone.
Follow the Vancouver legalisation model and trip over the unconscious and occasionally dead bodies on the village green.
Absolutely true. I live near Vancouver. It was a clean, pleasant, city forty years ago. Now there are daily shootings between different gangs, invariably from South Asia. Dead bodies and feces on the sidewalk, – the sort of thing that I saw in India.
On the other hand, go to Singapore if you like clean, safe streets.
It*also has a very efficient gallows in Changi Gaol.
*Singapore.
No drugs there though, so it’s a bit dull.
If they are unconscious or dead, they are not really doing anyone any harm.
Legalise the drugs and the gangs will move on to something else. The problem is lack of political will to enforce any law, not just drug law. Harassing law-abiding people over their perfectly legal opinions is, of course, another matter entirely.
Civilization has disappeared from Britain. The corpse just hasn’t fallen over yet.
“Somali gangs from southeast London traditionally ran drugs down to Kent…all the while, Albanian and Turkish gangs from north and east London work Hertfordshire and Essex; west Londoners, mainly Afro-Caribbean, take Hampshire, Berkshire and Surrey.”
Are you thinking what I’m thinking?
If people could buy their sniff from shops, legally, this would all go. I mean, you don’t get rival off-licence owners knifing each other to control the market, do you?
The tragic thing is that you can buy a week’s mushroom juice from Holland delivered by the GPO for the price of half a gram of dubious, in more than one sense, white powder.
Speaking as someone familiar with both, those two things are VERY different.
Don’t we ever learn? The growth of the mafia in the US was facilitated by prohibition; the catalogue of vileness that Dominic Adler describes here is the predictable result of the criminalisation of drugs. Sure, people are weak and stupid and it would make sense to put a lot more effort into discouraging them from doing themselves harm via narcotics. But, given this evidence, who can honestly claim that criminalisation has had any significant preventive effect at all? Instead of just having a big drug problem, we have a big drug problem + organised criminals running riot.
Come now Mr Eagle, this is no forum for common sense! It is literally impossible to police by exclusion the human desire for narcotics; we allow nicotine and alcohol but ban the rest. Prohibition leads to crime and a lack of quality control, both of which lead to a lot of misery and some premature death. Legalise, regulate and tax; of course there will be unpleasant side-effects, as there are with booze and burning tobacco, but they won’t be worse than the current disaster area.
…cue Jason Statham (SBS WO1, retd.) chatting to Ralph Fiennes (SIS, retd and local Squire) in the latter’s Library about the recent loss by overdose of a troubled but well-liked teenager by accidental OD, and you have the basis for a top-notch shoot-em-up shot in Surrey…substitute the guys who do that stuff in the real world, and you have a solution. If any Government had the backbone…there is little doubt in my mind we still have the capacity to deliver the necessary outcomes…
And here we’re praising the fact less people are having a beer. Now we know why.
Beer is good. Why would you praise the fact that people are drinking less?
Legalise and tax the crap out of it. It’s the only solution. Everywhere they’ve done it, it worked.
The effective decriminalisation of cannabis has helped legitimise this; the transformation of the Police into a politicised bureaucracy has exacerbated it.
And we all suffer.
Effective decriminalisation of cannabis is not enough. It should be completely decriminalised.
No! I understand that the police in Holland greatly regret the liberalisation of drug controls there, which have led to huge problems caused by greater consumption of mind-altering narcotics. And, as mentioned above, cities like L.A. and Vancouver bear witness to the misery and mayhem caused to communities by freely available drugs. If drugs are decriminalised and taxed, the drugs cartels will turn to smuggling to escape the taxes, as they have done with cigarettes. I am convinced that the Singapore solution is the correct one. If he death penalty, or at least extremely lengthy and unpleasant punishments, awaited drug dealers, our streets, like those of Singapore, would be safer and freer of drug-addled homeless wrecked human beings.
Great article.
What effect would it have if any foreign citizen found in possession of any illegal drug were immediately deported?